Baseball's First Week Always Lies - Until It Doesn’t

As the 2026 season begins to settle into its first rhythms, Red Sox fans are already doing what Red Sox fans have always done in late March and early April: reading too much into everything.

(Carolyn Kaster| Credit: AP)

A crisp Opening Day win feels like a signal. A sloppy extra-inning loss feels like a warning. A starting pitcher looks dominant and suddenly the entire rotation seems fixed. A bullpen wobble and the anxiety returns all at once.

That emotional swing is part of the charm of baseball’s first week. It happens every year, in every city. But in Boston, where the sport has long been woven into the emotional calendar of spring, the first few games always seem to carry a little more weight.

And yet, the truth Red Sox history teaches over and over again is this:

The first week always lies—until it doesn’t.

That’s what makes it so compelling. Early records are often deceptive. But early feelings? Early identities? Those can matter more than fans realize.

The 2026 Red Sox are already a perfect example.

Boston opened the season by beating Cincinnati behind an excellent first outing from new ace Garrett Crochet, who looked every bit like the kind of front-line starter a serious team can build around. Then came the next game, a messy and emotional extra-inning loss that featured a late blown lead, an ejection for manager Alex Cora, and the kind of frustrating chaos that makes fans wonder whether the old problems are still lurking beneath the surface.

At 1–1, the Red Sox are neither surging nor sinking. Which, in a strange way, makes them feel exactly like a baseball team in late March.

The temptation, of course, is to search for immediate meaning anyway.

That’s where Red Sox history becomes useful.

Take 2018, the easiest example for anyone looking to believe in a fast start. That team came out of the gate looking sharp, confident, and unmistakably complete. There was very little of the usual April uncertainty. The lineup was dangerous, the pitching was stable, and the team quickly gave off the feeling that it knew exactly what it was. By season’s end, it had become one of the most dominant teams in franchise history.

Sometimes the first week does not lie.

But those seasons are rarer than fans like to admit.

The 2013 Red Sox offer a more interesting comparison. That team entered the year with modest expectations, especially after the disappointment and dysfunction that had preceded it. There was no universal sense in March that a championship season was about to unfold. What emerged instead was something harder to define at first: energy, chemistry, resilience, a roster that seemed to enjoy itself and trust itself in equal measure.

That identity revealed itself gradually. It was not about a dazzling first few box scores. It was about the way the team played, the way it responded, the way it kept finding answers.

That’s often the real lesson of the first week.

Not whether a team is 3–1 or 1–3. Not whether the standings look promising before the weather even warms up. The real question is simpler and more difficult at the same time:

What kind of team does this look like?

That question matters because baseball’s early days can be misleading in obvious ways. A couple of bloop hits fall in and a lineup suddenly looks alive. A cold night suppresses offense and everyone starts talking about a lack of pop. Bullpens, especially, can look airtight one day and unreliable the next.

But even in that noise, there are clues.

You can tell if a starting pitcher looks comfortable attacking hitters. You can tell if at-bats feel competitive, even when they end in outs. You can tell if young players look rushed by the moment or settled inside it. You can tell if a team looks tight after a mistake—or whether it keeps playing.

Those things matter in Boston because Red Sox fans don’t only evaluate talent. They evaluate temperament.

A Red Sox team does not need to be perfect in April. It does, however, need to feel like it can handle April.

That’s part of what made the 2004 team so memorable. It wasn’t a smooth, elegant machine from wire to wire. It was emotional, occasionally uneven, sometimes maddening. But even before the historic October comeback against the New York Yankees, there was something about that group that felt sturdy in a different way. They absorbed pressure. They had an edge. They had personality.

That can show up long before a team fully reveals how good it actually is.

And that may be the most important thing to watch with the 2026 club.

Not the exact record after five games. Not the inevitable overreactions that follow the first rough bullpen outing or the first stranded bases-loaded opportunity. Those moments are part of every season. The Red Sox have had excellent teams that looked ordinary for stretches in April, and they have had flawed teams that briefly looked brilliant before gravity returned.

What matters more is whether this roster begins to show a recognizable shape.

Does Crochet truly look like the kind of starter who changes the emotional math of a series? Can the bullpen absorb an early stumble without letting it multiply? Does the lineup grind through at-bats, even when timing isn’t fully there yet? Do the younger pieces look like passengers, or do they look like contributors?

Those are the signals that linger.

Because the first week is deceptive mostly when fans treat it like a verdict. It rarely is.

But the first week can still offer hints.

Sometimes a hot start is just weather and adrenaline. Sometimes a slow start is nothing more than timing. And sometimes, buried inside a 2–3 record or a split series, a team quietly tells you exactly what it plans to be.

That’s what makes the opening stretch of a baseball season so irresistible.

It invites hope while resisting certainty.

It gives every fan base a reason to dream, and every fan base a reason to worry, often within the same 48 hours. In Boston, that tension is familiar. It’s part of the experience. The first week isn’t just the start of the schedule—it’s the return of a certain way of feeling. The daily checking of scores. The immediate judgments. The old arguments revived over coffee, over text chains, over sports radio, over the first Fenway homestand.

And as always, the truth will take time.

The standings will change. The weather will warm. Players who look lost will find rhythm. Players who look unstoppable will cool off. Some early heroes will fade. Others will become part of the story.

That’s why the first week always lies.

Until, once in a while, it doesn’t.

And the trick for Red Sox fans, as it has always been, is knowing the difference.

If you're interested in being notified when the next article comes out, be sure to scroll down to the "Free Subscription" form and subscribe, we hope you enjoyed!